Skip to main content

Anode driver

In this post, we will see how to build the anode driver:

- principle,
- basic components,
- how that works,
- how to calculate the proper values

The anodes of the Nixie gas tubes need a driver when multiplexed in order to switch the appropriate digit.

This driver is built using two transistors (1 NPN and 1 PNP) able to withstand high voltage (the Nixie tubes need 170VDC to switch on).
MPSA42 (NPN) and MPSA92 (PNP) are commonly used, as they are available and cheap components.

The circuit for the anode driver should be as follow:



The resistor R4 is there to limit the current that flows to the Nixie.

The tricky part, at least for me was to properly choose the resistors R1 to R4.
Let's start with R4, obviously the easiest one.
You need to know your Nixie tube characteristics:
- voltage to ignite the gas in the tube,
- the maximal current the gas tube needs to glow properly.
and also how many digits you would multiplex with one anode driver.

I have chosen classic IN-14 tubes, as they are available and not too expensive.
The datasheet (from tubehobby.com) gives:
- supply voltage Ub = 170V,
- maintaining voltage Ua = 145V,
- current of Ik = 2.5mA max per gas tube.


As we have two tubes in parallel:
- R4 will have to let pass 5mA (Ik +Ik = IR4),
- the voltage for the Nixie will still be Ub = 170V.

Once fired up, the Nixie tube will require "only" around 145V to maintain the glow (Ua = 145V)

We can then determine UR4, voltage drop at the resistor:
Ub = Ua + UR4 => UR4 = Ub - Ua = 170V - 145V = 25V.

And from that, resistance value of R4, that we will call... R4 (...erm):
UR4 = R4 x IR4 => R4 = UR4 / IR4 = 25V / 5mA = 25V / 0.005A = 5000 ohms

5k resistors do not exist, 5.6k should be used, and as the tubes will still require 145V to function, then I4 will slightly change:
I4 = UR4 / R4 = 25V / 5600 ohms = 0.0044A = 4.4mA => each tube will receive 2.2mA, which is good value.

And the power used for this resistor is then:
PR4 = U4 x IR4 = 25V x 0.0044A = 0.11 W

It is now time to give values for R2 and R3.

So we know the resistor R4 will see 4.4mA passing through.
We need to know the min current in order to saturate the PNP transistor and "feed" the Nixie gas tubes connected to R4.

MPSA92 has a transistor effect (beta coefficient) of at least 25 according to the datasheet.
The min current Ib1 through the base needs to be at least 1/25 of the current going through the collector, which is I4:
Ib1 > I4 / 25 = 0.0044 / 25 = 0.176 mA

And from there, we can determine R2 and R3, using the characteristics of the saturated MPSA92:


Yes, you have seen that for this try, I was using Ub = 175V instead of 170V.
Using this 170V, then:
UR2 = 169V
R2 = 169 / 0.0046 = 36.7 kohms => so we would still choose a 39k resistor.

And finally:
PR2 = UR2 x IR2 = 169 x 0.0046 = 0.78 W
PR3 = UR3 x IR3 = 0.9 x 0.0044 = 0.004 W

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuild of a Solex carburettor 26AIC

I am always keen to rework old mechanical parts, not only to satisfy my thirst for knowledge but also for the pleasure to bring back to life an old thing long forgotten. In this article, we will review a Solex carburettor 26AIC. Here is the thing: I have been happy to discover that mobile parts were not seized :D A bit of history: This carburettor was initially fitted on Renault Juvaquatre (1938-39): Photo from Lars-Göran Lindgren (Sweden)/ Wikipedia Another variant exists for Peugeot 202 , with a slight difference however: on the top, the 26AIC for the Peugeot has two holes to attach a protector on top: The Solex 26AIC has also been used on this models: Standard Flying Eight Side Valve 1938-48 Reliant 3 Wheeler Regal 1952-58 Reliant Export 1952-62 And also on industrial engines: Coventry Climax FSM2 & FSM3 Engines 1939-49 That's all for the history bit for now, the next step is to strip it down! 😄 Stripping down t...

Remplacement du tableau électrique... Episode 1 !

Hello, hello! Encore un long moment sans billet. Les travaux me prennent pas mal de temps, et lorsque je peux écrire un petit quelque chose, la flemme se pointe et m'agresse sauvagement! Avec cette nouvelle année (meilleurs vœux!!), je vais essayer de tenir mon blog un peu plus à jour. Et non ! Ce n'est pas une "bonne résolution"... Je n'en prends jamais, comme ça, pas de déception, pas d'échec. ^-^ Pour inaugurer 2011, je profite de ne pas être chez moi pour écrire un petit billet sur les premiers travaux de l'année. Sujet: le remplacement de mon tableau électrique, "épisode I: la mise en sécurité." La maison a été construite avant 1840 (la dernière grosse modification structurelle daterait de 1841). Ne s'agissant pas d'une réhabilitation totale, j'essaie juste d'être au plus proche de la norme NF C 15-100, mais sans que ce soit une obligation absolue. Je n'ai pas posé de GTL, par exemple. J'ai également une can...

Which controller for this project?

Here we are... What are the criteria to choose the "good" controller? - Price of the IC => this one is not a problem, those components are just so... Cheap !! Oo' - Number of pins for this project - Easy to code, as it is a first for me - Size - Availability of the coding software & kit Regarding the size, the idea is to be able to program the controller and install it on the board, or install the controller on the board and upload the code. For this reason, I do not think Arduino is a good idea. Don't get me wrong, I don't say it is not good (I am not an expert) and I should give it a try for another project, just that it does not appear the best solution to have a stand-alone controller for this project without any interface/ intermediary card. Then we have mainly two options: PIC controllers from Microchip or AVR from Atmel. After having spent a long time reading different articles, comparatives, forums, etc etc... Well... Both solutions can...